Re: [Isms] draft-hardaker-isms-dtls-tm-05 submitted - tlstmNotifications

["Donati Andrew-MGIA0477" <adonati at motorola.com>]

Wes,

Will it be feasible to define optional notifications for each the 
events defined by the counters below ?

tlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates
tlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates 

- Andy Donati
  Motorola HN&M

-----Original Message-----
From: isms-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:isms-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Wes Hardaker
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 12:30 PM
To: isms at ietf.org
Subject: [Isms] draft-hardaker-isms-dtls-tm-05 submitted


I've just posted an updated version of my DTLS draft.  I've left the
name the same until it becomes a WG document after the charter is
approved, at which point I'll drop the 'd' in the draft title so it's
just '-tls'.

The biggest change in this version of the draft is the incorporation of
the straight TLS transport in addition to the DTLS transport previously
described.  Most of the text changes are very straight forward as the
text was fairly generically pointed to TLS related features in the first
place.  In a few places, however, TLS or DTLS are specifically called
out.

  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hardaker-isms-dtls-tm-05.txt

--
Wes Hardaker
Cobham Analytic Solutions
_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
Isms at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms