Re: [Isms] draft-hardaker-isms-dtls-tm-05 submitted - tlstmNotifications
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Isms] draft-hardaker-isms-dtls-tm-05 submitted - tlstmNotifications
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:52:31PM +0200, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> There really isn't such a thing as "_the_ (D)TLS service". A given host
> might have any number of services utilizing TLS or DTLS on different ports
> with different configuration. It's not multiplexed the way SSH might be,
> and you wouldn't want to combine management information for them. Ideally,
> there'd be some kind of "MIB fragment" describing (D)TLS which could be
> incorporated into MIB's for various services using those protocols, of
> which the SNMP DTLS TM is just one.
We implemented SNMP over SSH by linking in an SSH library; we do not
go through an sshd and hence assuming SSH is "multiplexed" is not
always correct. This is all implementation choice. I agree that an SSH
MIB or [D]TLS MIB would have to provide proper indexing so that
multiple concurrent SSH or D[TLS] instances can export data to the
SNMP agent.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.