Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:18:43 -0400, "Donati Andrew-MGIA0477" <adonati at motorola.com> said:

DA> Yes.  They are indeed listed in the in the 'MANDATORY-GROUPs' clause,
DA> but was looking for additional 'GROUP' and 'DESCRIPTION' clauses for
DA> each group.  The 'DESCRIPTION' clause can contain information on whether
DA> or not the group is mandatory or optional to implement, as illustrated
DA> in rfc2580.

Ah, so you're not asking for clarification.  You want the notifications
to be removed from the mandatory clause.  If you read 5.4.1 of RFC2580
carefully you'll see that as-is the MIB describes conformance
requirements perfectly: the notifications are required.

We'll see what the results of the discussion are with respect to whether
others agree with you that they should be optional and removed from the
MANDATORY-GROUPS list.  (David, eg, seems to think they should stay).
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Cobham Analytic Solutions