Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications

To: "Donati Andrew-MGIA0477" <adonati at motorola.com>
Subject: Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1 at hardakers.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:45:47 -0700
Cc: isms at ietf.org
Delivered-to: isms at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <E6658A5CB6378B46A7F9C43757A73977049DE093 at de01exm63.ds.mot.com> (Donati Andrew-MGIA's message of "Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:35:39 -0400")
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms>
List-help: <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group <isms.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:isms@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms>, <mailto:isms-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Sparta
References: <sd7hug30d2.fsf at wjh.hardakers.net> <E6658A5CB6378B46A7F9C43757A73977049DDF7E at de01exm63.ds.mot.com> <sdmy390wm3.fsf at wjh.hardakers.net> <E6658A5CB6378B46A7F9C43757A73977049DE00D at de01exm63.ds.mot.com> <sd7huc27e3.fsf at wjh.hardakers.net> <E6658A5CB6378B46A7F9C43757A73977049DE093 at de01exm63.ds.mot.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux, no MULE)

>>>>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:35:39 -0400, "Donati Andrew-MGIA0477" <adonati at motorola.com> said:

DA> I see what you are saying and actually vote for them to stay mandatory
DA> as I believe that they are important to all network administrators.

Ah, ok.  Then I think there is no longer a problem to resolve, correct?
As we now have no one vying for making them optional and the current
objects definitely mark them as mandatory.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Cobham Analytic Solutions

References:
- [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review
  - From: Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications
  - From: Donati Andrew-MGIA0477
- Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications
  - From: Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications
  - From: Donati Andrew-MGIA0477
- Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications
  - From: Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications
  - From: Donati Andrew-MGIA0477

Prev by Date: Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications
Next by Date: Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - tlstmServerAuthFailure and notification
Previous by thread: Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications
Next by thread: Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - tlstmServerAuthFailure and notification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: [Isms] SNMP over (D)TLS draft available for review - Group compliance statements for notifications

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.