[jose] CLOSED: Support Multiple types for algorithms
Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> Wed, 24 October 2012 10:41 UTC
Return-Path: <odonoghue@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763DE21F8BCC for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPk84xmfEeD9 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp166.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp166.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.166]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED87F21F8BB4 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 86E4B270877 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:35:26 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: odonoghue-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 0D81D270868 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:35:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <5087C46D.8090905@isoc.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:35:25 -0400
From: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Organization: ISOC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jose@ietf.org
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366877975@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366877975@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366877975@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [jose] CLOSED: Support Multiple types for algorithms
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: odonoghue@isoc.org
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:41:48 -0000
Folks, The results of this poll were: 1 YES - Support should be mandated to allow an algorithm to be both a string and an object 14 NO - Support should not be mandated to allow an algorithm to be both a string and an object 4 DISCUSS - More discussion is needed Based upon these results, I am making a consensus call that support should not be mandated to allow an algorithm to be both a string and an object. This issue is now closed. Thanks to all who participated in this poll. Karen O'Donoghue (writing as working group co-chair) -----Original Message----- From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:05 AM To: jose@ietf.org Subject: [jose] POLL: Support Multiple types for algorithms <CHAIR> If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS. Should support be mandated to allow an algorithm to be both a string and an object Example: "alg":{"name":"EC-DH-SS", "random":"XXXXX", "KDF":"CS256", "kid":"12345"} Room vote: 1 yes, 5 no, 4 discuss _______________________________________________ jose mailing list jose@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
- [jose] CLOSED: Support Multiple types for algorit… Karen O'Donoghue