[jose] CLOSED: Add other than pre-shared MAC key
Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> Wed, 24 October 2012 10:41 UTC
Return-Path: <odonoghue@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: jose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD67421F8BB2 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wvbWJXvBlwG8 for <jose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp166.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp166.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.166]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A9221F8BC9 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 03:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D4DB6270875 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:35:38 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp6.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: odonoghue-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 675282707F9 for <jose@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:35:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <5087C479.6050403@isoc.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:35:37 -0400
From: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Organization: ISOC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jose@ietf.org
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366877989@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366877989@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366877989@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [jose] CLOSED: Add other than pre-shared MAC key
X-BeenThere: jose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: odonoghue@isoc.org
List-Id: Javascript Object Signing and Encryption <jose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose>
List-Post: <mailto:jose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose>, <mailto:jose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:41:49 -0000
Folks, The results of this poll were: 4 YES - We should add the ability to have a randomly generated MAC key protected by a different key 13 NO - We should not add the ability to have a randomly generated MAC key protected by a different key 4 DISCUSS - More discussion is needed Based upon these results, I am making a consensus call that we should not add the ability to have a randomly generated MAC key protected by a different key. This issue is now closed. Thanks to all who participated in this poll. Karen O'Donoghue (writing as working group co-chair) -----Original Message----- From: jose-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:07 AM To: jose@ietf.org Subject: [jose] POLL: Add other than pre-shared MAC key <CHAIR> If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS. Should we add the ability to have a randomly generated MAC key protected by a different key? The other key could be either a pre-shared symmetric key or a public key. Room vote: 3 yes, 5 no, 3 discuss _______________________________________________ jose mailing list jose@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
- [jose] CLOSED: Add other than pre-shared MAC key Karen O'Donoghue