Re: [jose] Naming of JWK key_ops values for wrap and unwrap

+1

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Brian Campbell
<bcampbell@pingidentity.com>wrote:

> +1
> On Feb 5, 2014 4:06 PM, "Mike Jones" <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>  I believe that we should make this change, since it aligns with the
>> WebCrypto editor's draft at
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html.  I
>> believe that the names "wrap" and "unwrap" came from the older draft at
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/WebCryptoAPI/.
>>
>>
>>
>>                                                             -- Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* jose [mailto:jose-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Watson
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:01 PM
>> *To:* jose@ietf.org
>> *Subject:* [jose] Naming of JWK key_ops values for wrap and unwrap
>>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Since JWK key_ops was added primarily to accurately represent WebCrypto
>> keys, would it be possible to amend the values for "wrap" and "unwrap" to
>> "wrapKey" and "unwrapKey" to align with the WebCrypto naming ?
>>
>>
>>
>> ...Mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jose mailing list
>> jose@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> jose@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>