Re: CIFS and the krb5 PRF

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Peterson <mpeterson at vintela.com> writes:

    Matt> On Thursday 21 April 2005 12:38, Nicolas Williams wrote:
    >> KITTEN is not charatered to design a raw krb5 mechanism and
    >> associated mechanism-specific GSS extensions.  Generic GSS
    >> extensions, OTOH, do fall under its charter.
    >> 
    >> There's no need to burden the KITTEN list subscribers with talk
    >> of a GSS-based API for raw krb5, at least not yet.
    >> 
    >> None of which means that a raw krb5 API based on the GSS-API
    >> couldn't be documented in IETF RFCs.  All we need is a forum
    >> with the right participants, and I do believe that this is
    >> pretty close to being the right forum.
    >> 
    >> this == krbdev

    Matt> Ok.  As a *mechanism-specific GSS extension* moving the
    Matt> discussion to a new forum makes sense. (I assume the
    Matt> discussion falls outside the scope of ietf-krb-wg charter?)

Note that the krb-wg or kitten chairs could decide that the discussion
was appropriate on their lists even if it is out of charter.  They
would typically do so if they expected the discussion to be relatively
short, contained and not to get in the way of the working group's
efforts.

--Sam


_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten