Re: request for agenda items

To: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman at columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: request for agenda items
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>, c at mit.edu
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:16:09 -0400
Cc: Kitten <kitten at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <20050629223848.GS16670@binky.Central.Sun.COM> (Nicolas Williams's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:38:48 -0500")
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/kitten>
List-help: <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:kitten@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <42C0844B.2030300@columbia.edu> <tsl1x6k95xt.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <20050629221332.GQ16670@binky.Central.Sun.COM> <tslslz07qt2.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <20050629223848.GS16670@binky.Central.Sun.COM>
Sender: kitten-bounces at lists.ietf.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> writes:

    Nicolas> There's no RFC2119 reference or language in the base
    Nicolas> specs, which I assume would automatically block a move to
    Nicolas> Draft Standard without a respin.

Not to my knowledge.

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

Follow-Ups:
- Re: request for agenda items
  - From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: request for agenda items
  - From: Nicolas Williams

References:
- request for agenda items
  - From: Jeffrey Altman
- Re: request for agenda items
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Re: request for agenda items
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: request for agenda items
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Re: request for agenda items
  - From: Nicolas Williams

Prev by Date: Java Bindings do not need to be removed was Re: Proposed PRF changes to address Ken's comments
Next by Date: Re: request for agenda items
Previous by thread: Re: request for agenda items
Next by thread: Re: request for agenda items
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: request for agenda items

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.