Re: Java Bindings do not need to be removed was Re: Proposed PRF changes to address Ken's comments
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Java Bindings do not need to be removed was Re: Proposed PRF changes to address Ken's comments



Nicolas Williams wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 06:28:26PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> 
>>Implementors are free to implement prf() as part of their implementation
>>specific classes that also implement the GSSContext interface.  A new
>>interface should not be published until the GSSv3 spec is complete.
> 
> 
> I agree -- and I think Seema meant that we should hold off on designing
> new such Java interfaces until we get to the GSS-APIv3.

Then we have consensus.  :)


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.