Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs



I believe that Nico is interested in the binding between GSS
authentication and SAML data.

Jeffrey Altman


Von Welch wrote:

> I'm not sure what you mean by "abandoned". We're not moving the
> document forward in GGF because we deferred to kitten as the place to
> do so, but the document does capture what we saw as our needs and we
> have implemented and are using it.
> 
> I'm not sure from the context of your note what part of it you were
> specifically interested in. I'm happy to field questions or elaborate.
> 
> Von
> 
> Nicolas Williams writes (13:09 July 19, 2005):
>  > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:06:04PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>  > > There's a Globus OGSA document describing what I recognize to be a sort
>  > > of stackable pseudo-mechanism, but I can't find a URL for it.  As soon
>  > > as I find it I'll post it.
>  > 
>  > Bah.  It looks like the GGF has abandoned this -- don't be misled by the
>  > last update date -- that was a macro.
>  > 
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Kitten mailing list
>  > Kitten at lists.ietf.org
>  > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kitten mailing list
> Kitten at lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.