Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs

[Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com>]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:19:22PM -0500, Von Welch wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by "abandoned". We're not moving the
> document forward in GGF because we deferred to kitten as the place to
> do so, but the document does capture what we saw as our needs and we
> have implemented and are using it.
> 
> I'm not sure from the context of your note what part of it you were
> specifically interested in. I'm happy to field questions or elaborate.

If you've deployed then it'd be a good idea to update this doc.

I do have a few questions about this mechanism though, such as what its
OID(s) is(are).

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten