Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs

To: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman at columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:25:07 -0500
Cc: kitten at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <42DFACE9.2010406@columbia.edu>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/kitten>
List-help: <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.lists.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:kitten@lists.ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman at columbia.edu>, Von Welch <vwelch at ncsa.uiuc.edu>, kitten at ietf.org
References: <20050719180604.GT4303@binky.Central.Sun.COM> <20050719180929.GA5809@binky.Central.Sun.COM> <17117.17450.881204.232069@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <42DFACE9.2010406@columbia.edu>
Sender: kitten-bounces at lists.ietf.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.7i

On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 10:10:49AM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> I believe that Nico is interested in the binding between GSS
> authentication and SAML data.

Indeed.

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
  - From: Von Welch

References:
- GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
  - From: Nicolas Williams
- Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
  - From: Von Welch
- Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
  - From: Jeffrey Altman

Prev by Date: Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
Next by Date: Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
Previous by thread: Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
Next by thread: Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.