Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GGF evidently needs stackable pseudo-mechs



On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 05:31:53PM -0500, Von Welch wrote:
> Conceptually one could define an OID meaning give me any SAML
> attribute assertions associated with the client in the context.
> 
> I also recall a conversation a while back where someone (you or
> Jeffrey I think) argued this would be better done as a inquiry
> mechanism based on the gss_name, which I agree with.

We have two KITTEN WG Internet-Drafts on this:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-kitten-gss-naming-02.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-naming-exts-00.txt

I don't recall anymore who suggested it -- Jeff, Sam or I, but it
doesn't matter; what matters is that KITTEN is chartered to do this
work, so the GGF will want to help ensure we're addressing its needs.

So please review them! :)

Thanks,

Nico
-- 

_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.