![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 05:31:53PM -0500, Von Welch wrote: > Conceptually one could define an OID meaning give me any SAML > attribute assertions associated with the client in the context. > > I also recall a conversation a while back where someone (you or > Jeffrey I think) argued this would be better done as a inquiry > mechanism based on the gss_name, which I agree with. We have two KITTEN WG Internet-Drafts on this: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-kitten-gss-naming-02.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-naming-exts-00.txt I don't recall anymore who suggested it -- Jeff, Sam or I, but it doesn't matter; what matters is that KITTEN is chartered to do this work, so the GGF will want to help ensure we're addressing its needs. So please review them! :) Thanks, Nico -- _______________________________________________ Kitten mailing list Kitten at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten