RE: Please review: http gss authentication mech
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Please review: http gss authentication mech
Nico,
Thankyou for correcting me, on my assumption related to channel
bindings.
Regards,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas Williams [mailto:Nicolas.Williams at sun.com]
Sent: 16 November 2006 21:50
To: Tim Alsop
Cc: Leif Johansson; Kitten; Lisa Dusseault
Subject: Re: Please review: http gss authentication mech
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 04:19:42PM +0000, Tim Alsop wrote:
> > I am under the impression that the proposed SASL mechanism doesn't
> support channel
> > bindings, partially because channel bindings have been a notoriously
> difficult problem to get
> > right in SASL space. Personally I din't see the value of adding the
> extra layer of glue.
>
> My understanding is that, if SASL is using GSS/Kerberos to protect
HTTP
> communications, then GSS channel bindings can be used, so SASL does
not
> need to have direct support for channel bindings. This is an advantage
> of using a multi-layered architecture.
Your understanding is wrong.
First of all, there's an API issue -- which, since the IETF does not
standardize a SASL API you might hand wave away.
Second, there's a semantic issue, and this is far more important.
Rather than re-hash this here you might want to look at the SASL WG
mailing list archives and the gs2 I-D (draft-ietf-sasl-gs2) and its
evolution. Then you'll understand why GSS channel bindings in the SASL
"GSSAPI" mechanism are generally not usable.
Third, we need channel binding to TLS to avoid re-doing the GSS (or
SASL) authentication over and over, and so what's the point of using
SASL if the only SASL mechs that would support channel binding were the
GSS-based ones (using SASL/gs2)? And if channel binding support is
added to SASL MD5-DIGEST, with the same semantics, can't we also add a
GSS-API mechanism that uses the same credentials as MD5-DIGEST? And why
isn't HTTP MD5-DIGEST good enough anyways? And what other SASL
mechanisms did you want to use with this?
Nico
--
_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.