![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I'm not sure that we actually want GSS_Compare_name() to sport such behaviour, as opposed to having a new function that does, because it's pushing things a bit to say that the two NAME objects passed to it are equal representations of the same principal. They are representations of the same principal name, just not _equal_ representations of it.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________ Kitten mailing list Kitten at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten