Re: Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana-02.txt

[Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu>]

--On Tuesday, March 25, 2008 11:36:09 AM +0000 Alexey Melnikov 
<alexey.melnikov at isode.com> wrote:

> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>
>>>>  | Status         | 'Standards-Track',         | Status of the       |
>>>>  |                | 'Informational',           | registration.       |
>>>>  |                | 'Experimental',            |                     |
>>>>  |                | 'Obsolete', 'Other'        |                     |
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I think you need to be more specific about what the status is. Is it
>>> status of the document defining the namespace registration? Or of the
>>> registration itself?
>>>
>>>
>> The description already answers that :)
>>
> Well, in this case you need to define what
> 'Standards-Track','Informational', 'Experimental', 'Obsolete' and
> 'Other' mean.
> Including who determines the relevant status. With document status it is
> simple. With registrations that can be submitted in email, or be
> described in anything other than RFC, this is not clear.

What is the purpose of assigning such a status to a registration, separate 
from that of the specification for the registered extension?

-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Kitten mailing list
Kitten at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten