![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
11 aug 2009 kl. 14:10 skrev Alexey Melnikov:
Is such API already available
no
and if the answer is no, are people interested in working on defining it?
sure, I think the definition of SSF is broken, and its not simple to understand, racing to yet another higher number seems bad.
Love