Re: GSS_Inquire_name()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSS_Inquire_name()
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:06:47PM +0200, Luke Howard wrote:
> >>Are all names in all or just the one that are not in asserted/
> >>authenticaticated names ?
> >>
> >>Love
> >
> >Do you mean "are there attributes that are neither asserted nor
> >authenticated?"
>
> As an implementer this left me completely confused too.
>
> BTW, see:
>
> http://k5wiki.kerberos.org/wiki/Projects/VerifyAuthData
>
> for actual implementation experience.
I can't quite remember what I had intended :(
I think I must have meant 'all_attrs' to be the union of the other two
purely for conviennce. But on second (or third) thought I can't see why
an app might care for attrs without caring as to whether they are
authenticated or asserted.
(Also, there is the more general problem of what entity authenticated a
given attribute. But for now I think GSS_Inquire_name() is plenty good
enough, minus the all_attrs argument anyways.)
Nico
--
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.