![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I can't quite remember what I had intended :( I think I must have meant 'all_attrs' to be the union of the other twopurely for conviennce. But on second (or third) thought I can't see whyan app might care for attrs without caring as to whether they are authenticated or asserted.(Also, there is the more general problem of what entity authenticated a given attribute. But for now I think GSS_Inquire_name() is plenty goodenough, minus the all_attrs argument anyways.)
So when should applications care about the name exists w/o checking content ?
I think there should only be an "all" and caller have to call get-name- attribute to get the attribute.
Love