RE: Re-charter Take 2: Virtual Private Multicast Service (VPMS)

["Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi at cisco.com>]

O.K. Thanks. The definition of VPMS looks good. Lets ship it :-)

-Ali

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shane Amante [mailto:shane at castlepoint.net] 
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 7:08 AM
> To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
> Cc: l2vpn at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Re-charter Take 2: Virtual Private Multicast 
> Service (VPMS)
> 
> Ali,
> 
> The proposed, updated charter was included in the first mail 
> that started this thread.  You can find a copy of the mail, 
> including the proposed charter, here:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/current/msg01724.html
> 
> -shane
> 
> 
> 
> Ali Sajassi (sajassi) wrote:
> > Shane,
> > 
> > Where is "a full copy of the proposed charter, including VPMS" ?
> > 
> > I looked through your previous emails and I found the following url 
> > but there is no description of VPMS.
> > 
> > http://l2vpn.tcb.net/recharter/l2vpn-recharter.txt
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Ali
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org] On 
> >> Behalf Of Shane Amante
> >> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 8:17 PM
> >> To: l2vpn at ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re-charter Take 2: Virtual Private Multicast 
> Service (VPMS)
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> It seems that the PWE3 WG has completed their re-charter activity, 
> >> which now includes defining P2MP PW's:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pwe3-charter.html
> >>
> >> As a result, we would like to conduct a short call for interest to 
> >> include VPMS (likely utilizing P2MP PW's) into the new L2VPN WG 
> >> charter, before submitting it to the IESG.
> >> Please indicate to the mailing list whether you agree that 
> it should 
> >> be included in the new L2VPN charter.  (Silence will not count as 
> >> support).  Also, please speak up if you have comments or 
> >> clarifications with respect to the proposed wording of VPMS.
> >>
> >> Copied below is a full copy of the proposed charter, 
> including VPMS.
> >>
> >> We will close discussion and gauge consensus on this issue in
> >> 2 weeks, on Wednesday, 7/23, at 17:00 MDT, UTC -6.
> >>
> >> Finally, this call *is not* re-opening the entire charter for 
> >> discussion, rather this is narrowly focused strictly on 
> whether, or 
> >> not, to add VPMS to the previously agreed upon L2VPN charter.
> >>
> >> -shane & Vach
> >>
> >>
> 
>