[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: L2vpn Digest, Vol 50, Issue 6



Hi Bala,
1.  Many of the concerns in the mentioned  post were discussed in Philadelphia. You might be able to find more in the meeting minutes and the slide for the presentation of Vpls-MIB in Philadelphia IETF.
 
2.  I agree, the index name for the index to vplsPwBindEntry should be changed to pwIndex instead of vplsPwBindIndex, this will lead to a TC reference change a well.
 
thanks,
Rohit


From: l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bala Venkata
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 10:18 AM
To: l2vpn at ietf.org
Subject: Re: L2vpn Digest, Vol 50, Issue 6

Hello,

In response to the following

> ------------------------------
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
> Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-02.txt
> To: i-d-announce at ietf.org
> Cc: l2vpn at ietf.org
> Message-ID: <20080715163001.E6FD23A6AEF at core3.amsl.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> ------------------------------

1. I never saw any responses to the mib file comments made here except for the vplsPwBindIndex one:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/current/msg01595.html


2. It looks as though the vplsPwBindIndex variable has been removed. But it is still being referenced by the
vplsPwBindEntry &
one or more other tables ?



Thanks !

/bala