[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VPLS Dual Homing

To: <linux.yahoo at gmail.com>, <l2vpn at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: VPLS Dual Homing
From: "HENDERICKX Wim" <wim.henderickx at alcatel-lucent.be>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:15:26 +0200
Delivered-to: l2vpn at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcoAnw3e0SJuskVsSAqTq5ArkZVJYgAAKchx
Thread-topic: VPLS Dual Homing

There is a common draft posted this week which addresses mh for both ldp and bgp based vpls. I am on mobile now, but could send it later to you.

Cheers,
Wim
_________________
sent from blackberry

From: l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org <l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org>
To: l2vpn at ietf.org <l2vpn at ietf.org>
Sent: Thu Jul 09 16:10:29 2009
Subject: VPLS Dual Homing

Is there any draft/rfc coming about VPLS Dual Homing?

AFAIK when using BGP signaling, it was possible to connect a site to muliples PEs by using the same site-id, BGP will choose.

AFAIK when using LDP signaling, STP between CEs/PEs can be used (option 1) or ICCP betweens PEs (option 2) can be used.

Is there any way to have a common design? or is it the same debate than previous one?

Thanks in advance

Prev by Date: VPLS Dual Homing
Next by Date: Re: VPLS Dual Homing
Previous by thread: Re: VPLS Dual Homing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread