[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VPLS Dual Homing

To: Manu Chao <linux.yahoo at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VPLS Dual Homing
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti at juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:15:02 -0700
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "l2vpn at ietf.org" <l2vpn at ietf.org>
Delivered-to: l2vpn at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <7100ed370907090710m5214595fta2a8c3ba748271bf at mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7100ed370907090710m5214595fta2a8c3ba748271bf at mail.gmail.com>
Thread-index: AcoAn6kcYSlAGNYRRhSRPGyDXrhR4Q==
Thread-topic: VPLS Dual Homing

On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:10, "Manu Chao" <linux.yahoo at gmail.com<mailto:linux.yahoo at gmail.com>> wrote:

Is there any draft/rfc coming about VPLS Dual Homing?

Yes.

 AFAIK when using BGP signaling, it was possible to connect a site to muliples PEs by using the same site-id, BGP will choose.

AFAIK when using LDP signaling, STP between CEs/PEs can be used (option 1) or ICCP betweens PEs (option 2) can be used.

Is there any way to have a common design? or is it the same debate than previous one?

There will be a common design between BGP VPLS and BGP AD

 Thanks in advance

Kireeti

Follow-Ups:
- Re: VPLS Dual Homing
  - From: Peng He

References:
- VPLS Dual Homing
  - From: Manu Chao

Prev by Date: Re: VPLS Dual Homing
Next by Date: Re: VPLS Dual Homing
Previous by thread: VPLS Dual Homing
Next by thread: Re: VPLS Dual Homing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread