Re: draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospf-2547-04 L3VPN/OSPF WG Last Call

[Eric Rosen <erosen at cisco.com>]

> With respect to sham link advertisement on page 8 the draft says "...PE1
> may flood to CE1 a type 1 LSA advertising a link to PE2, and PE2 may
> flood to CE2 a type 1 LSA advertising a link to PE1." Then, on Section
> 4.2.8.4, it says sham link endpoint address routes must not be
> redistributed into OSPF. 

What section  4.2.8.4 means is that  the routes of type  "sham link endpoint
address" are to be treated only as specified in section 4.2.7, and the rules
of 4.2.8 (4.2.8.1, 4.2.8.2) do not apply.