[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on draft-ietf-l3vpn-ppvpn-mcast-reqts-03

In case anyone missed it with the nit discussion flying around, I agree.

Marshall

On 1/24/06, Pekka Savola <pekkas at netcore.fi> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Thomas Morin wrote:
> > Below is my suggestion for a reshaped section 5.1.11.
> > It aims at distinguishing between the three different problems that we
> > may have: RP outsourcing, RP availability, RP location.
> >
> > Feel free to comment.
> ...
>
> I think the general thrust of the new section is good; it properly
> separates the different issues wrt RP engineering, so I'm fine with
> it.
>
> --
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>
>