[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Accept As WG Document?: draft-mnapierala-mvpn-part-reqt-02
> Would you like to accept draft-mnapierala-mvpn-part-reqt as an L3VPN
> WG document?
YES
We have to keep in mind that this work is based on (to my knowledge) a
detailed analysis of the current biggest production deployment,
ignoring this proposal / work will be at the end the same as not
listening to our end users and their specific needs.
Fernando Calabria
Cisco Systems
AS Technical Leader
mailto:fcalabri at cisco.com
On Jul 28, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Danny McPherson wrote:
> Folks,
> On June 26 Ron sent a call to the list for acceptance of
> draft-mnapierala-mvpn-part-reqt-02 as a WG document.
> After some 25 message on the associated thread (many from the same
> folks, or Maria's responses to comments) there doesn't yet appear to
> be consensus on whether it should be accepted or not.
>
> If you have interest in this work, could you please reply to the
> following question with a simple "yes" or "no"?
>
> Would you like to accept draft-mnapierala-mvpn-part-reqt as an L3VPN
> WG document?
>
> You're encouraged to include comments further along in the message, or
> in a separate message, but a binary "yes"
> or "no" will help with clear consensus gauging. If you've already
> commented no need to restate your position, it's been accounted for.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Marshall & Danny