Re: Advancing the Protocol and Morin Drafts

[ycai <ycai at cisco.com>]

Marshall,  Danny,


On 10/1/08 7:04 AM, "Marshall Eubanks" <tme at multicasttech.com> wrote:

> This email starts a 3 week call for input, to expire October 23, 2008,
> for the following steps:
> 
> 1.) To accept draft-morin-l3vpn-mvpn-considerations-03 as a working
> group document;  and

No.

> 
> 2.) To turn this document into a requirements draft, with mandatory to
> implement features for an interoperable implementation. The authors
> have indicated that they are willing to do this.
> 

Given where the two solution drafts are,  I'm not sure we need another
requirement draft. 

> Our intention is, if this approach is accepted, to then begin WG last
> call to submit to the IESG for publication:
> 
> draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast
> draft-ietf-l3vpn-2547bis-mcast-bgp
> 

I think these two drafts can progress without 1) or 2) above.

Thanks.


> We expect that these two documents will be submitted more or less as is
> (i.e., certainly with any new bug fixes or other necessary corrections
> and
> improvements, but without specific mandatory to implement feature
> description in those drafts).
> 
> Please respond to the list with your recommendations for these two
> courses of action.
> 
> Regards
> Marshall & Danny
> 


-- 
Yiqun