Re: Regarding draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-csc-01

[Yakov Rekhter <yakov at juniper.net>]

Ice,

> Dear WG,
> 
> I like to get some input from the WG regarding draft-wijnands-mpls- 
> mldp-csc-01.
> 
> I presented this draft in MPLS WG at IETF in Stockholm and got the  
> comments from Yakov that this document contains work that belongs in  
> L3VPN. It was suggested this document should be split in 2 different  
> drafts, a non-L3VPN specific draft and a L3VPN specific draft.
> 
> Considering how small the draft is and how close the non-L3VPN and  
> L3VPN procedures are, I would prefer to keep this one draft. We can do  
> a last call in both WG's and present it in L3VPN, but we do the work  
> in MPLS.
> 
> I would appreciate if you voice your opinion, after reading the  
> draft :-)

The size of the document does not change the fact that section 3
of the document is completely outside the scope of MPLS WG. That
is precisely why I proposed to remove section 3 from the document,
and progress the revised document in MPLS WG.

Yakov.