Re: [lemonade] WGLC draft-ietf-lemonade-compress-02.txt

[Philip Guenther <guenther+lemonade at sendmail.com>]

On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Randall Gellens wrote:
...
> Sorry for not being clear: I don't think we need an IANA registry, because we 
> don't expect to define future mechanisms.  If we find that we do need other 
> mechanisms, we can define those in new RFCs that extend this one.

I don't think we expect to see future THREAD mechanisms either, but it's 
apparently simpler and less contentious to create a registry than it is to 
_not_ do so.  As author/editor/review time is the most precious commodity 
in the IETF, creating the registry and copying text to do so that people 
have already nodded their heads at seem like the most efficient choice.


Philip Guenther

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade