Re: [lemonade] Compress, future algorithm and their arguments

[Mark Crispin <MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU>]

+1

On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> > Because of this, I would prefer to leave it open. I would prefer to state 
> > the syntax as
> >     "COMPRESS" SP algorithm
> > and if some day an RFC comes along and needs arguments, it can extend the 
> > syntax somewhat generally, and it can do at least as good a job then as we 
> > can now.
> I agree.

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade