RE: [lemonade] 'MOVE' (was Notifications for multiple devicesper user)

[<Zoltan.Ordogh at nokia.com>]

>>  I am not worried about the protocol level - I am worried  showing a 
>> mixed mailbox to the user (where some mails are in the trash  as 
>> expected and some are not).
>
>There's a difference between where a message is on the server, 
>and how the message is presented to the user.  If clients want 
>to present a distinct "Trash" mailbox to the user, that is 
>fine.  Forcing the metaphor to be literally true is a poor use 
>of IMAP and causes problems.  Making it easy for clients to 
>efficiently present a Trash metaphor to users is a good thing. 
> I assume the users don't care which elements of the protocol 
>are used in which ways by the client. 
>They want to manage messages in a way that feels natural for them.

Somehow this thread went back to discussing Trash instead of MOVE.
I read through Mark's email as well. I accept what You are saying - my
worry is that the operators will say at the last minute (when LEMONADE
is already done) that they want a separate trash and force us to do
something proprietary (I mean it will be a standard anyway in OMA, but
might not be in line with LEMONADE).

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade