Re: [lemonade] WGLC NOTIFY

[Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>]

On Jun 21, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > So I wouldn't mind if NOTIFY had a big switch that worked like:
> >
> > a) Immediate: Send expunges, exists and everything else immediately  
> > to client
> >
> > b) Delayed: Server is allowed (but not required) to delay all  
> > events until a command is executed that allows returning expunges  
> > (usually IDLE, but also others)
> I've changed the definition of "SELECTED" to "SELECT immediate" as  
> you defined above. I've also added SELECTED-DELAYED, which  
> corresponds to "SELECTED delayed" in your proposal.

Sounds good. Is there also something about MessageExpunge being  
unnecessary (or even illegal?) in SELECTED/SELECTED-DELAYED and  
MessageNew being unnecessary (or even illegal?) unless it specifies  
FETCH options?

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade
Supplemental Web Site:
http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/lemonade