Re: [lemonade] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-notify-06.txt

[Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>]

> <<Open Issue: should there be a way to require the server to return  
> UNSEEN?>>

My suggestion would be MessageNew-like parameters, maybe:

 - FlagChange : Track all changes, don't return UNSEEN
 - FlagChange (\Seen \*) : Track all changes, return UNSEEN
 - FlagChange (\Seen) : Track only \Seen changes, return UNSEEN

This would also allow in future:

 - FlagChange ($keyword1 $keyword2)

2) Perhaps the ABNF should be changed so that filter-mailboxes- 
selected can only contain message-events? And related to that: Is the  
NONE events useful elsewhere than for SELECTED/SELECTED-DELAYED? I  
don't think so? So maybe the ABNF could be like:

event-group = event-group-selected / event-group-other

event-group-selected = "(" filter-mailboxes-selected SP message-events  
")"

message-events = ( "(" message-event *(SP message-event) ")" ) / "NONE"

events = ( "(" event *(SP event) ")" )
    ;; NONE dropped

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade
Supplemental Web Site:
http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/lemonade