[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"

To: eburger at standardstrack.com
Subject: Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
From: Dan Karp <dkarp at zimbra.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Cc: lemonade at ietf.org
Delivered-to: lemonade at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <607407038-1256157775-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1036114557- at bda365.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lemonade>
List-help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> Clearly, given the modular nature of LEMONADE, I would not expect
> anyone to implement all of LEMONADE. Does that change anyone's
> hesitation to say "yes"?

Is there a minimum subset required to answer "yes"?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
  - From: Eric Burger

References:
- [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
  - From: eburger

Prev by Date: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
Next by Date: Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
Previous by thread: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
Next by thread: Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread