[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"

To: Dan Karp <dkarp at zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
From: Eric Burger <eburger at standardstrack.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:49:59 +0900
Cc: lemonade at ietf.org
Delivered-to: lemonade at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <661875402.14422.1257637576746.JavaMail.root at dogfood.zimbra.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lemonade>
List-help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <661875402.14422.1257637576746.JavaMail.root at dogfood.zimbra.com>

Given I'm looking to do some PR saying, "look at how many people areimplementing LEMONADE," I would offer anything goes.


Of course, the minimum useful set is Profile 1.

On Nov 8, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Dan Karp wrote:

Clearly, given the modular nature of LEMONADE, I would not expect
anyone to implement all of LEMONADE. Does that change anyone's
hesitation to say "yes"?


Is there a minimum subset required to answer "yes"?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
  - From: Ned Freed

References:
- Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
  - From: Dan Karp

Prev by Date: Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
Next by Date: [lemonade] Who's doing what
Previous by thread: Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
Next by thread: Re: [lemonade] Clarification on LEMONADE "use"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread