IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [link-relations] NEW APP DATA

Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> Tue, 10 August 2010 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <plh@w3.org>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E873A686D for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.984
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.615, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQrc5YV4gJde for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4BF3A695E for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 30-7-253.wireless.csail.mit.edu ([128.30.7.253]) by jay.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <plh@w3.org>) id 1OiuG0-0003cr-8S; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:13:04 -0400
From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <9CDE7636-3E12-48AA-A351-FDD432112978@mnot.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008090401280.7470@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <9CDE7636-3E12-48AA-A351-FDD432112978@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:13:03 -0400
Message-ID: <1281467583.701.298.camel@chacal>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:36:25 -0700
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW APP DATA
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:12:32 -0000

On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Also, the WHATWG URLs are more stable than the W3C ones at this
> point (the W3C keeps taking things out, splitting the specs into
> other specs, etc), and I didn't want to have to keep updating the
> registration.

Correct, the consensus process of the W3C gives a chance to
organizations and individuals that are part of the Web community to
weight in on the content of the HTML specification.

In addition, I would note that it seems that this registration request
is premature and unstable, given the ongoing discussion within the HTML
Working Group, as pointed out by Julian Reschtke.

Regards,

Philippe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email