Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 11 August 2010 10:06 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8DC3A6890 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 03:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.032
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.433, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id itP4ZjlYiqEN for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 03:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C89F73A6855 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 03:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2010 10:06:55 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.147]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 12:06:55 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX187+NQaagY7NN+wYySFkezqUNa7j2T6MaGfbZAREk yKs2dAuJdCC1cr
Message-ID: <4C627639.6040307@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:06:49 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008100803420.22575@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4C61A497.8080106@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008102110230.11992@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4C6263B2.9090008@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008110925060.22155@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008110925060.22155@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:06:22 -0000
On 11.08.2010 11:26, Ian Hickson wrote: > ... >> It's now: >> >>> This is the registration template for this value in the Link Relations >>> registry: [IANALINKTYPE] >>> Relation Name: >>> alternate >>> Description: >>> Gives alternate representations of the current document, provides a link to >>> a syndication feed, or modifies the meaning of other link relations, >>> depending on context. >>> Reference: >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#rel-alternate >>> Notes: >>> (none) >>> Application Data: >>> (none) >> >> (side note: just because it should be in the spec doesn't mean it doesn't >> *also* make sense to post it here). >> >> That being said, I'm fine with this registration if it actually refers to the >> W3C Working Draft (that is,<http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/>). > > So to be clear, you are rejecting this registration unless it references > the out-of-date snapshot document on the W3C site rather than either the > WHATWG document or the current W3C document? (So in particular, you are > rejecting this registration at least until the next snapshot publication?) >... I haven't rejected anything. I'm saying that the registration should point to a stable document in W3C space, and I don't think the "current editor's copy" qualifies as that. What's the problem with waiting with the actual registration until the new WD is out? Best regards, Julian
- [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Ian Hickson
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Ian Hickson
- [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Ian Hickson
- [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Ian Hickson
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Ian Hickson
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Ian Hickson
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Ian Hickson
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST Ian Hickson
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Ian Hickson
- [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST "archives",… Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST "archiv… Ian Hickson
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST "archiv… Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Ian Hickson
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingb… Mark Nottingham