lisp Discussion Archive - Date Index

[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index] [IETF Mailing List Directory] [lisp List Information]

Mar 17 2011

Re: [lisp] #71: Missing description mechanism to make EID-to-RLOC (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #89: On redefining the name of the encapsulated packet header (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] Issue Title (number): Limiting number of headers(90), Yakov Rekhter
[lisp] Re-opened issues (and further discussion), Luigi Iannone

Mar 16 2011

Re: [lisp] #94: Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 reported by Y. Rekhter), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #94: Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #101: Filtering ICMP messages (comment 19 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #111: Semantics of LSB, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #27: ETR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #42: On the SMR mechanism, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] #44: LISP vs existing (reported by Yakov Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #45: LISP vs. Existing (from Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #46: Cache Thrashing (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #47: Ambiguity on "MAP-replies" requirements (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #49: "MAP-Replies" content that is allowed to change (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #50: MAP-Replies content that MUST be invariant (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] #53: Reachability between ETR and EID (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #57: How to determine EIDs not forwardable on the routable topology (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #66: Strict RLOC ordering causing problems on mapping changes, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #94: Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 reported by Y. Rekhter), Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] #70: Client not respecting RLOC weights (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #73: Tunnel liveness (from R. Bonica review for the RTG directorate), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #71: Missing description mechanism to make EID-to-RLOC (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #81: Implication of deploying of xTRs as first/last hop., lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #89: On redefining the name of the encapsulated packet header (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #90: Restricting re-encapsulation (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #94: Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #98: LISP nonce (comment 17 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #114: EID-to-RLOC mapping - transients, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #48: MAP-Replies returning different contents for a given EID (review by Y, Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #81: Implication of deploying of xTRs as first/last hop., lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #81: Implication of deploying of xTRs as first/last hop., lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #71: Missing description mechanism to make EID-to-RLOC (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #71: Missing description mechanism to make EID-to-RLOC (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #41: Map-Reply sent for not reachable EID (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #41: Map-Reply sent for not reachable EID (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #38: On the limitation of LISP recursive encapsulation (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #38: On the limitation of LISP recursive encapsulation (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #111: Semantics of LSB, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #111: Semantics of LSB, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #105: EID-to-RLOC UDP Map-Reply message (comment 23 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #105: EID-to-RLOC UDP Map-Reply message (comment 23 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #102: Originating ITR RLOC address (comment 20 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #102: Originating ITR RLOC address (comment 20 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #101: Filtering ICMP messages (comment 19 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #101: Filtering ICMP messages (comment 19 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #100: "Stateless" and "Stateful" MTU handling (comment 18 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #100: "Stateless" and "Stateful" MTU handling (comment 18 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #94: Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #94: Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #90: Restricting re-encapsulation (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #90: Restricting re-encapsulation (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #89: On redefining the name of the encapsulated packet header (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #89: On redefining the name of the encapsulated packet header (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #73: Tunnel liveness (from R. Bonica review for the RTG directorate), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #73: Tunnel liveness (from R. Bonica review for the RTG directorate), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #70: Client not respecting RLOC weights (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #70: Client not respecting RLOC weights (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #68: What is the source address for a negative reply, which has a zero length locator -set ? (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #66: Strict RLOC ordering causing problems on mapping changes, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #66: Strict RLOC ordering causing problems on mapping changes, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #57: How to determine EIDs not forwardable on the routable topology (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #57: How to determine EIDs not forwardable on the routable topology (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #53: Reachability between ETR and EID (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #53: Reachability between ETR and EID (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #46: Cache Thrashing (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #46: Cache Thrashing (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #45: LISP vs. Existing (from Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #45: LISP vs. Existing (from Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #44: LISP vs existing (reported by Yakov Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #44: LISP vs existing (reported by Yakov Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #39: On the performance of cache lookup (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #39: On the performance of cache lookup (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #98: LISP nonce (comment 17 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #98: LISP nonce (comment 17 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #34: Editorial Issues Section 8 of draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #34: Editorial Issues Section 8 of draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #43: Issues related to RLOC rechability (definition and mechanism), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #43: Issues related to RLOC rechability (definition and mechanism), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #42: On the SMR mechanism, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #42: On the SMR mechanism, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #50: MAP-Replies content that MUST be invariant (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #50: MAP-Replies content that MUST be invariant (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #49: "MAP-Replies" content that is allowed to change (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #49: "MAP-Replies" content that is allowed to change (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #48: MAP-Replies returning different contents for a given EID (review by Y, Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #48: MAP-Replies returning different contents for a given EID (review by Y, Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #47: Ambiguity on "MAP-replies" requirements (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #47: Ambiguity on "MAP-replies" requirements (review by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #40: On the handling of decapsulated packets (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #40: On the handling of decapsulated packets (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #28: An ITR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #28: An ITR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #27: ETR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #27: ETR may claim a larger prefix than is delegated to it, lisp issue tracker

Mar 14 2011

[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-mib-01.txt, Gregg Schudel
[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-meyer-lisp-eid-block-02.txt, Luigi Iannone
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-mib-01.txt, Internet-Drafts

Mar 12 2011

[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-ms-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
[lisp] [idsubmission at ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lisp-ms-07], Vince Fuller
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Dino Farinacci

Mar 12 2011

[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-saucez-lisp-security-03.txt, Luigi Iannone

Mar 11 2011

Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Vince Fuller
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-map-versioning-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Vince Fuller

Mar 10 2011

Re: [lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Gregg Schudel
Re: [lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Mathieu Peresse
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Fabio Maino
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Terry Manderson
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Terry Manderson

Mar 09 2011

Re: [lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Mathieu Peresse
Re: [lisp] Prague, and important dates., Terry Manderson

Mar 04 2011

[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-maino-lisp-sec-00.txt, Dino Farinacci

Mar 04 2011

[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lisp-alt-06, Vince Fuller
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-alt-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Internet-Drafts
[lisp] Changes updates to draft-ietf-lisp-ms, Vince Fuller

Mar 03 2011

Re: [lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Dino Farinacci

Feb 24 2011

Re: [lisp] Fwd: Email input to WG issue trackers., Luigi Iannone

Feb 23 2011

Re: [lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Joel M. Halpern
[lisp] Proposed minor changes for draft-ietf-lisp-10.txt, Dino Farinacci
[lisp] Fwd: Email input to WG issue trackers., Joel M. Halpern

Feb 21 2011

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #113 (new): inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Dino Farinacci

Feb 21 2011

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #113 (new): inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Yakov Rekhter
[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-jakab-lisp-deployment-02.txt, Joel M. Halpern

Feb 18 2011

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #113 (new): inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Stefano Secci
Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #113 (new): inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #36 (new): On the validation of EID-to-RLOC mappings (from D. Papadimitriou's review), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #82 (new): Wording in Abstract (comment 8 and 44 reported by Y. Rekhter), Dino Farinacci

Feb 15 2011

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #113 (new): inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #48 (reopened): MAP-Replies returning different contents for a given EID (review by Y, Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #36 (new): On the validation of EID-to-RLOC mappings (from D. Papadimitriou's review), lisp issue tracker

Feb 14 2011

Re: [lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP and uRPF and Anonomous Tunneling(58), Darrel Lewis
Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #82 (new): Wording in Abstract (comment 8 and 44 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP and uRPF and Anonomous Tunneling(58), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp #58 (new): LISP breaking RPF and used as anonymization service (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker

Feb 07 2011

[lisp] Prague, and important dates., Terry Manderson

Jan 05 2011

[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-mib-00.txt, Gregg Schudel
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-mib-00.txt, Internet-Drafts

Jan 03 2011

Re: [lisp] Setting up a LISP IPv4 environment, Noel Chiappa
[lisp] Setting up a LISP IPv4 environment, Sam Stickland
[lisp] Setting up a LISP IPv4 environment, Sam Stickland

Jan 03 2011

Re: [lisp] ETR selection?, Michael Menth
Re: [lisp] ETR selection?, Jesper Skriver
Re: [lisp] ETR selection?, Michael Menth
Re: [lisp] ETR selection?, Jesper Skriver

Dec 30 2010

Re: [lisp] ETR selection?, Noel Chiappa
[lisp] ETR selection?, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)

Dec 24 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Gregg Schudel

Dec 22 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Terry Manderson

Dec 05 2010

Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Loránd Jakab

Dec 04 2010

Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Luigi Iannone
Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Dino Farinacci

Dec 03 2010

Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, David Meyer
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, David Meyer
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Gregg Schudel
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Damien Saucez
Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Luigi Iannone
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Luigi Iannone
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Job W. J. Snijders
Re: [lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Victor Moreno (vimoreno)
Re: [lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Terry Manderson
[lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00 as a work group item, Terry Manderson
[lisp] a /16 of IPv6 for LISP EID, Terry Manderson

Nov 29 2010

Re: [lisp] LISP-WG minutes from IETF79, David Meyer
Re: [lisp] LISP-WG minutes from IETF79, Dino Farinacci
[lisp] LISP-WG minutes from IETF79, Terry Manderson

Nov 22 2010

[lisp] WG meeting feedback on the deployment document, Loránd Jakab

Nov 12 2010

Re: [lisp] MTU, Loránd Jakab
Re: [lisp] MTU, Templin, Fred L

Nov 11 2010

Re: [lisp] MTU, Jesper Skriver
Re: [lisp] MTU, Templin, Fred L
Re: [lisp] MS project, Marshall Eubanks
Re: [lisp] MS project, Terry Manderson
[lisp] MS project, Rana Adil
Re: [lisp] MTU, Darrel Lewis

Nov 10 2010

[lisp] MTU, Templin, Fred L

Oct 24 2010

[lisp] Proposed changes to draft-jakab-lisp-deployment, Loránd Jakab

Oct 22 2010

Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)

Oct 20 2010

Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Vince Fuller
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Noel Chiappa

Oct 18 2010

[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lisp-alt-05, Vince Fuller
[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lisp-ms-06, Vince Fuller
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-ms-06.txt, Internet-Drafts
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-alt-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-saucez-lisp-iterable-mapping-00, Damien Saucez

Oct 17 2010

Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, HeinerHummel
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, HeinerHummel

Oct 16 2010

Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, heinerhummel
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Dino Farinacci

Oct 15 2010

Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Dino Farinacci
[lisp] EID allocation / ALT base, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Dino Farinacci

Oct 14 2010

Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Dino Farinacci

Oct 13 2010

Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Loránd Jakab
Re: [lisp] Deployment: Map Resolvers, Vince Fuller
Re: [lisp] Deployment: Map Resolvers, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Deployment: Map Resolvers, Vince Fuller
[lisp] Deployment: Map Resolvers, Joel M. Halpern
[lisp] Deployment Document - P-ITR, Joel M. Halpern

Oct 11 2010

[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-multicast-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-lig-01.txt, Internet-Drafts

Oct 11 2010

[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-09.txt, Internet-Drafts

Oct 10 2010

Re: [lisp] Is LISP specifying a mechanizm to encapsulate an outer IP header over IP frame?, Noel Chiappa

Oct 08 2010

Re: [lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-jakab-lisp-deployment-00, Loránd Jakab

Oct 07 2010

Re: [lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft-jakab-lisp-deployment-00, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)

Oct 05 2010

[lisp] Is LISP specifying a mechanizm to encapsulate an outer IP header over IP frame?, Linda Dunbar

Oct 05 2010

Re: [lisp] IETF 79 request for agenda items, Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] IETF 79 request for agenda items, Luigi Iannone
Re: [lisp] IETF 79 request for agenda items, Noel Chiappa

Oct 04 2010

Re: [lisp] IETF 79 request for agenda items, Vince Fuller

Sep 29 2010

[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-map-versioning-00.txt, Luigi Iannone
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Terry Manderson
[lisp] Proposed minor updates to draft-ietf-lisp-09.txt, Dino Farinacci
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-map-versioning-00.txt, Internet-Drafts

Sep 28 2010

[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-jakab-lisp-deployment-00, LorÃnd Jakab
[lisp] IETF 79 request for agenda items, Terry Manderson

Sep 16 2010

[lisp] Fwd: NomCom 2010-2011: Call for More Nominations, Joel M. Halpern

Sep 07 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Terry Manderson

Sep 04 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Pierre Francois

Sep 03 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Florin Coras
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Isidor Kouvelas
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work groupitem, Victor Moreno (vimoreno)
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Terry Manderson
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Vince Fuller
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Terry Manderson
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, John Zwiebel

Sep 02 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Gregg Schudel
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Job W. J. Snijders
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Amit Jain
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, David Meyer
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Jesper Skriver
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Terry Manderson

Aug 31 2010

[lisp] lig updated...., David Meyer

Aug 25 2010

[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-interworking-01.txt, Internet-Drafts

Aug 23 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, brad dreisbach
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, brad dreisbach
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Loránd Jakab
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Loránd Jakab

Aug 22 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Niels Raijer

Aug 17 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Amit Jain
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Gregg Schudel
[lisp] draft-schudel-lisp-mib-00.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Robert Raszuk
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Victor Moreno (vimoreno)
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Damien Saucez
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Damien Saucez
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, David Meyer
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Job W. J. Snijders
Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Dino Farinacci
[lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-lcaf-00 as a work group item, Terry Manderson
[lisp] draft-iannone-lisp-mapping-versioning as a work group item, Terry Manderson

Aug 13 2010

[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Internet-Drafts

Aug 12 2010

Re: [lisp] Draft minutes from IETF78 Maastricht, Terry Manderson
[lisp] Draft minutes from IETF78 Maastricht, Terry Manderson
Re: [lisp] Updates for draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Updates for draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Damien Saucez

Aug 11 2010

[lisp] Updates for draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Dino Farinacci

Aug 10 2010

Re: [lisp] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Damien Saucez
Re: [lisp] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Damien Saucez
Re: [lisp] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Joel M. Halpern

Aug 09 2010

Re: [lisp] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Damien Saucez

Aug 06 2010

[lisp] Issue Title (number): SMR handling (42), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): RLOC Reachability (43), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Map Reply Consistency (47, 48, 49, 50), Darrel Lewis

Aug 02 2010

[lisp] Proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-08.txt, Dino Farinacci
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Data Probe Decap (40), Darrel Lewis
Re: [lisp] More work needed I think., Darrel Lewis

Jul 28 2010

Re: [lisp] Issue Title (number): LSB handling details (66), Damien Saucez

Jul 20 2010

Re: [lisp] More work needed I think., Terry Manderson

Jul 20 2010

[lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP for inbound TE (113), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Re-encapsulating Tunnels underspecefied (112), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Anycasting RLOCs (111), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Returning all 3 prefixes (105), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): MTU and ICMP Filtering(101), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): ETR support of Map-Requests Flood(104), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Originating ITR address (102), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): MTU handling Stateless(100), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP Data Packet Nonce(98), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Control Plane Performance (94), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Limiting number of headers(90), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Naming of the Inner Header (89), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): PIvsPA (87), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Lock in to EID Provider (84), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Editorial comment about LISP (82), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Site location of xTRs (81), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Editorial Comments to Section 8 (34), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Header Prepending (38), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Map-Cache Validation (36), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): EID to RLOC selection (73), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): EID to RLOC selection (71), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Cache Lookup Performance (39), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): ITR ignoring weights (70), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Map-Reply Security (69), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Source of Negative Map Reply (68), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): LSB handling details (66), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Host BAsed Implementation (64), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP-TE and ETR(63), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP and uRPF and Anonomous Tunneling(58), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): How to determine EIDs not forwardable on the routable(57), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): ETR Failure Restoration (55), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): ITR Failure Restoration (54), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): EID Reachability (53), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP vs Multihoming w NAT (45), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP Cache Handling (46), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): LISP vs PI addressing (44), Darrel Lewis
[lisp] Issue Title (number): Map Reply Sent when EID is unreachable (41), Darrel Lewis
Re: [lisp] More work needed I think., Darrel Lewis

Jul 14 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-klein-lisp-mn-nat-traversal-00 and TTR Mobility, Robin Whittle
[lisp] IETF78 draft agenda, Terry Manderson

Jul 13 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-klein-lisp-mn-nat-traversal-00 and TTR Mobility, Michael Menth
[lisp] draft-klein-lisp-mn-nat-traversal-00 and TTR Mobility, Robin Whittle

Jul 12 2010

Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-saucez-lisp-security-01.txt, Dino Farinacci
[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-saucez-lisp-security-01.txt, Damien Saucez

Jul 06 2010

[lisp] Updated EEMDP proposal for managing holes in maps, Sriram, Kotikalapudi

Jul 05 2010

[lisp] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-klein-lisp-mn-nat-traversal-00], Michael Menth

Jun 22 2010

[lisp] [Fwd: Please volunteer for the 2010-2011 Nomcom], Joel M. Halpern

Jun 13 2010

[lisp] planning for IETF78, Terry Manderson

Jun 04 2010

Re: [lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Yakov Rekhter

Jun 03 2010

Re: [lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Olivier Bonaventure
[lisp] [Fwd: IETF 78 - Meeting and Sponsorship Information], Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] LISP WG meeting on IETF 78, Joel M. Halpern
[lisp] LISP WG meeting on IETF 78, Humberto Galiza

Jun 01 2010

Re: [lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Yakov Rekhter

May 30 2010

Re: [lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, Olivier Bonaventure

May 25 2010

Re: [lisp] More work needed I think., Terry Manderson

May 25 2010

Re: [lisp] More work needed I think., Darrel Lewis
[lisp] More work needed I think., Terry Manderson

May 24 2010

[lisp] #113: inbound traffic engineering support with LISP, lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #112: use of re-encapsulation is underspecified, lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #111: Semantics of LSB, lisp issue tracker

May 18 2010

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-interworking-01, Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)

Apr 30 2010

Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Joel M. Halpern

Apr 29 2010

Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Eliot Lear
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Darrel Lewis
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Ross Callon
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Robert Raszuk
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Eliot Lear
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Dino Farinacci

Apr 28 2010

Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Ross Callon
Re: [lisp] #82: Wording in Abstract (comment 8 and 44 reported by Y. Rekhter) (was: Wording in Abstract (comment 8 reported by Y. Rekhter)), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), Eliot Lear
Re: [lisp] #93: VPN (comment 14 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #91: Data probe (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #110: "Mapping Protocol Data" in Map-Reply Message Format (comment 22 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #109: "Locator" in Map-reply message format (comment 22 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #108: "R" bit in Map-Reply message format (comment 22 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #107: "Weight" in Map-Reply Message Format (comment 22 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #106: Unassigned values in Map-Reply messages (comment 22 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #105: EID-to-RLOC UDP Map-Reply message (comment 23 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #104: Impact of slashdotting ETR (comment 21 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #103: Mapping Protocol Data (comment 20 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #102: Originating ITR RLOC address (comment 20 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #101: Filtering ICMP messages (comment 19 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #100: "Stateless" and "Stateful" MTU handling (comment 18 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #99: Confusion in Section 5.4.1 (comment 18 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #98: LISP nonce (comment 17 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #97: MTU concerns (comment 16 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #96: Confidence in informal Survey (comment 16 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #95: On eliminating vs. deferring mapping lookup (comment 15 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #94: Implications on using Control plane for data forwarding (comment 15 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #93: VPN (comment 14 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #92: Restriction on number of encapsulations (comment 13 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #91: Data probe (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #90: Restricting re-encapsulation (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #89: On redefining the name of the encapsulated packet header (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #88: "Proxy device" description (comment 12 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #87: On reusing globally routed address block as EID-prefix (comment 11 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #86: On the design goals and requirements (comment 10 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #85: Mobility without address changing (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #84: Renumbering burden when clients change providers (comment 9 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #83: Wording in Abstract (comment 8 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #82: Wording in Abstract (comment 8 reported by Y. Rekhter), lisp issue tracker

Apr 26 2010

[lisp] #81: Implication of deploying of xTRs as first/last hop., lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #59: Editorial Issues Section 10 of draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (from Y. Rekhter's review), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #80: Router Performances, lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #33: Editorial Issues Section 7 of draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt, lisp issue tracker
[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lisp-alt-04, Vince Fuller
[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lisp-ms-05, Vince Fuller
[lisp] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lisp-alt-04, Vince Fuller
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-ms-05.txt, Internet-Drafts
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-alt-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [lisp] LISP Site definition, John Scudder
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Yakov Rekhter
[lisp] issue tracker, Joel M. Halpern
[lisp] #79: Editorial Issues (from J. Arkko's mail), lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #78: Missing things (from J. Arkko's mail), lisp issue tracker
Re: [lisp] #77: On the use of key-chaining for re-keying, lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #77: On the use of key-chaining for re-keying, lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #76: Implication of using anycast addresses for Map-servers, lisp issue tracker
[lisp] #75: Security of Map-Register message., lisp issue tracker
[lisp] I-D Action:draft-ietf-lisp-07.txt, Internet-Drafts
Re: [lisp] LISP Site definition, Noel Chiappa

Apr 24 2010

[lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-07.txt ready to post, Darrel Lewis

Apr 23 2010

Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], John Scudder
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] LISP Site definition, Scott Brim

Apr 23 2010

Re: [lisp] LISP Site definition, Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] LISP Site definition, Scott Brim
Re: [lisp] LISP Site definition, Darrel Lewis
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], John Scudder
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], Luigi Iannone

Apr 22 2010

Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], John Scudder
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Robert Raszuk
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Olivier Bonaventure
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Robert Raszuk
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Dino Farinacci
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Eliot Lear
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Robert Raszuk
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], Joel M. Halpern
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], Noel Chiappa
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] Discussion of comment 3 (Map-Replies) [was: Re: comments on draft-ietf-lisp-06.txt (part 1)], Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Eliot Lear
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Yakov Rekhter
Re: [lisp] #63: On the use of anycast addresses for RLOCs (from Y. Rekhter's review), Eliot Lear
Re: [lisp] Issue tracker: bunch of updates ahead, Luigi Iannone

Mail converted by MHonArc