[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces

From: Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com>
To: Robin Whittle <rw at firstpr.com.au>
Cc: lisp at ietf.org, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:46:20 -0700
In-reply-to: <49C194DE.6060502 at firstpr.com.au>
References: <20090318024449.DD3CA6BE556 at mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <49C194DE.6060502 at firstpr.com.au>

Loc-AFI is a 16 bit field with two currently defined options: IPv4
or IPv6.

Robin, you can have n namespaces with the same AFI value. RFC 2547VPNs is an example of this. And there are plenty more examples as well.


Dino

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
  - From: Robin Whittle

References:
- Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
  - From: Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
  - From: Robin Whittle

Prev by Date: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
Next by Date: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
Previous by thread: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
Next by thread: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.