[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces

From: Robin Whittle <rw at firstpr.com.au>
To: lisp at ietf.org
Cc: Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:11:46 +1100
In-reply-to: <7B0C1C66-3231-4C27-83C9-B06E851F3CBB at cisco.com>
References: <20090318024449.DD3CA6BE556 at mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <49C194DE.6060502 at firstpr.com.au> <7B0C1C66-3231-4C27-83C9-B06E851F3CBB at cisco.com>

Hi Dino,

You wrote:

> Robin, you can have n namespaces with the same AFI value. RFC 2547 VPNs
> is an example of this. And there are plenty more examples as well.

Maybe so, but this is nothing to do with LISP.

I stand by my critique:

  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg00273.html
  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg00288.html

  - Robin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
  - From: Dino Farinacci

References:
- Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
  - From: Noel Chiappa
- Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
  - From: Robin Whittle
- Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
  - From: Dino Farinacci

Prev by Date: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
Next by Date: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
Previous by thread: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
Next by thread: Re: [lisp] [ipdir] LISP WG: Loc/ID separation - not separate namespaces
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.