Thanks for taking a stab at improved charter text! As I discussed in my other message, it does not seem like an absolute requirement that the same address can never be used both as an EID and RLOC. Any chance you could work on clarifications to your text that do not strictly forbid this? Also, could I get feedback from the rest of the list on the text? Do we want to adopt it? If not, what do we want to fix about it?
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.