IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Review: Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Thu, 19 March 2009 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3117728C26F; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:11:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TouLxFBJfIyM; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF6128C26B; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id CD2054249; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:11:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
References: <20090318003000.264213A6A6C@core3.amsl.com> <49C18DD6.1020800@firstpr.com.au>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:11:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49C18DD6.1020800@firstpr.com.au> (Robin Whittle's message of "Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:12:06 +1100")
Message-ID: <tsleiwtzmgd.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Review: Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:11:05 -0000

Thanks for taking a stab at improved charter text!

As I discussed in my other message, it does not seem like an absolute
requirement that the same address can never be used both as an EID and
RLOC.  Any chance you could work on clarifications to your text that
do not strictly forbid this?

Also, could I get feedback from the rest of the list on the text?  Do
we want to adopt it?
If not, what do we want to fix about it?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email