Re: [lisp] My proposed revisions to the charter - LISP lacks proper terminology

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Robin" == Robin Whittle <rw at firstpr.com.au> writes:

    Robin> Short version: Most of the third paragraph should be
    Robin> replaced.  

Here, you may well be right:-)
I took a stab at things, but it looks like there is more work to do.
Most of what you said is stuff that I cannot really comment on as a chair.
    Robin>                    Sam wrote that a single address would
    Robin> "typically" not be used in EID and RLOC roles.  For a
    Robin> practical LISP system, "typical" is not strong enough - it
    Robin> is impossible.

    Robin>                    Noel still seems to think it is
    Robin> possible, but has yet to explain how.

I think there has been enough discussion on-list and other private
comments that the rough consensus of the participants so far is that
there will be cases where the same IP stands both as an EID and a
RLOC.
My claim that this typically does not happen may even be too strong:-)

I acknowledge that you disagree and that so far our sample size is
small.