IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] My proposed revisions to the charter - LISP lacks proper terminology

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 25 March 2009 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0C43A6AFB for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.994
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.994 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.505, BAYES_00=-2.599, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DgCACxykltmw for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (dhcp-46b4.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.70.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8133A6945 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 9BCB34144; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:38:08 -0400 (EDT)
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
References: <20090324212300.032356BE56C@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <49C98742.9000902@firstpr.com.au>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:38:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <49C98742.9000902@firstpr.com.au> (Robin Whittle's message of "Wed\, 25 Mar 2009 12\:22\:10 +1100")
Message-ID: <tslbprqe60v.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: lisp@ietf.org, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [lisp] My proposed revisions to the charter - LISP lacks proper terminology
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:37:27 -0000

>>>>> "Robin" == Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au> writes:

    Robin> Short version: Most of the third paragraph should be
    Robin> replaced.  

Here, you may well be right:-)
I took a stab at things, but it looks like there is more work to do.
Most of what you said is stuff that I cannot really comment on as a chair.
    Robin>                    Sam wrote that a single address would
    Robin> "typically" not be used in EID and RLOC roles.  For a
    Robin> practical LISP system, "typical" is not strong enough - it
    Robin> is impossible.

    Robin>                    Noel still seems to think it is
    Robin> possible, but has yet to explain how.

I think there has been enough discussion on-list and other private
comments that the rough consensus of the participants so far is that
there will be cases where the same IP stands both as an EID and a
RLOC.
My claim that this typically does not happen may even be too strong:-)

I acknowledge that you disagree and that so far our sample size is
small.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email