[lisp] EIDs MUST NOT be used as LISP RLOCs.

Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au> Wed, 25 March 2009 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rw@firstpr.com.au>
X-Original-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8433A69DF for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.010, BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5EK7YtvFYEz8 for <lisp@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gair.firstpr.com.au (gair.firstpr.com.au [150.101.162.123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B283A6768 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.6] (wira.firstpr.com.au [10.0.0.6]) by gair.firstpr.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3221759D8; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:08:53 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <49C9AE57.5070004@firstpr.com.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:08:55 +1100
From: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Organization: First Principles
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lisp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [lisp] EIDs MUST NOT be used as LISP RLOCs.
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:08:05 -0000

Just quoting the Good Book:

  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-12#page-8

Please see my previous message:

  Consensus?  EID and RLOC use of the same address = separate
  namespace debate

    - Robin