[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lisp] EIDs MUST NOT be used as LISP RLOCs.

From: Robin Whittle <rw at firstpr.com.au>
To: lisp at ietf.org
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:08:55 +1100

Just quoting the Good Book:

  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-12#page-8

Please see my previous message:

  Consensus?  EID and RLOC use of the same address = separate
  namespace debate

    - Robin

Follow-Ups:
- [lisp] MTU handling in LISP
  - From: Templin, Fred L

Prev by Date: [lisp] Consensus? EID and RLOC use of the same address = separate namespace debate
Next by Date: [lisp] MTU handling in LISP
Previous by thread: [lisp] Consensus? EID and RLOC use of the same address = separate namespace debate
Next by thread: [lisp] MTU handling in LISP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.