[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lisp] Suggested UDP checksum text

From: Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com>
To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw at sandstorm.net>
Cc: "lisp at ietf.org" <lisp at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:41:00 -0700
In-reply-to: <412E7B1A-AEAD-4ACD-8588-D6EFE6DDEAFF at sandstorm.net>
References: <643940D7-D234-4E67-BC5E-F5DF3D078D83 at cisco.com> <4A9C3A57.2010501 at joelhalpern.com> <412E7B1A-AEAD-4ACD-8588-D6EFE6DDEAFF at sandstorm.net>

The reference to the Eubanks-Chimento draft (which is in the noteJoel mentions above) should be changed to a normative reference, asit contains normative text necessary to implement this protocol(similar to the UDP RFC 768 reference).


Consider it done.

Dino

References:
- [lisp] Deadline for proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-04.txt is Friday Sep 4th
  - From: Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Suggested UDP checksum text
  - From: Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Suggested UDP checksum text
  - From: Margaret Wasserman

Prev by Date: Re: [lisp] Suggested UDP checksum text
Next by Date: Re: [lisp] Deadline for proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-04.txt is Friday Sep 4th
Previous by thread: Re: [lisp] Suggested UDP checksum text
Next by thread: Re: [lisp] Meanign of R bit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.