Re: [lisp] Deadline for proposed changes to draft-ietf-lisp-04.txt is Friday Sep 4th

[Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>]

>>>>> "Dino" == Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com> writes:

    >> Dino, the following entries reference comments I can't seem to
    >> find on the list.  Can you point me to the list discussion
    >> involved?

    Dino> There isn't any because the commenters choose to not use the
    Dino> list. 

OK, it definitely seems reasonable to me for people to suggest changes
to fix obvious bugs with basically one solution to you privately and
for you to go forward like you've done here.  Some of these additional
changes depend on changes in your first message I'm still reviewing.
However, unless we have some concerns about dependent changes, all of
these look fine.

    Dino> The diff file should be able to explain why the
    Dino> changes were made.

Not really; it does a much better job of explaining what changes were
made rather than why.  The level of detail you provided in your second
message is about right for changes based on private comments.

Thanks for the great work,

--Sam