>>>>> "Dino" == Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com> writes:
>> My personal preferences are
>>
>> 1) Joel's text with Margaret's updates saying receivers SHOULD
>> verify checksums 2) Joel's text with typo corrections 3)
>> Margaret's short text above with the additional of "LISP ITRs
>> MAY send a zero checksum" 4) Margaret's text in the thread
>> about closing issues #9, #10 and #12
Dino> How about Joel and Margaret get together and write the text
Dino> and I will include it. Provided it is detailed and accurate
Dino> enough. Joel's text was not specific enough to implement
Dino> from.
I'm happy with this provided that it's consistent with this discussion
and no one objects to it.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.