[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lisp] #16: map versioning resolution



On 9/3/09 4:11 PM, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> I understand everything in your message, but I still don't think it is
> necessary or advisable to allocate a "research bit" in the LISP header.

I'll go further.  I think adding research bits generally is a bad idea,
and in this case we are ducking an issue about version numbering.  Let's
not duck the issue.

Eliot

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.