[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lisp] My Position on Vince's Proposal and Issue #22...

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
To: Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com>
Cc: lisp at ietf.org, Margaret Wasserman <mrw at sandstorm.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:03:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <1CB12E33-6CC5-406B-88F6-30A8EBA03C39 at cisco.com> (Dino Farinacci's message of "Thu\, 24 Sep 2009 11\:37\:03 -0700")
References: <18A9FE09-5D81-4A60-AB66-E31297DF083C at sandstorm.net> <1CB12E33-6CC5-406B-88F6-30A8EBA03C39 at cisco.com>

>>>>> "Dino" == Dino Farinacci <dino at cisco.com> writes:

    Dino> Thanks Margaret for being open minded.
    Dino> I hope we can reach consensus on #NN.

I think we've reached rough consensus on #nn assuming it gets opened.
I seem to be the only one with an objection.

References:
- [lisp] My Position on Vince's Proposal and Issue #22...
  - From: Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [lisp] My Position on Vince's Proposal and Issue #22...
  - From: Dino Farinacci

Prev by Date: Re: [lisp] My Position on Vince's Proposal and Issue #22...
Next by Date: Re: [lisp] My Position on Vince's Proposal and Issue #22...
Previous by thread: Re: [lisp] My Position on Vince's Proposal and Issue #22...
Next by thread: Re: [lisp] My Position on Vince's Proposal and Issue #22...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.