[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lisp] #24: Encapsulated control packets on the LISP data port 4341

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
To: trac at localhost.amsl.com
Cc: lisp at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:04 -0400
In-reply-to: <057.9ff186693c7cb938e3dcb5fc65bd8b4c at tools.ietf.org> (lisp issue tracker's message of "Thu\, 24 Sep 2009 20\:16\:39 -0000")
References: <057.9ff186693c7cb938e3dcb5fc65bd8b4c at tools.ietf.org>

There appears to be rough consensus for this technical direction as a
solution to #24.  Issue #22 will remain open.  I'll give what comments
I can in a day or two on where we stand with a consensus on that
issue.


I've seen text for this in the lisp-05 draft so presumably the WG will
get a chance to review that shortly.

References:
- [lisp] #24: Encapsulated control packets on the LISP data port 4341
  - From: lisp issue tracker

Prev by Date: [lisp] #24: Encapsulated control packets on the LISP data port 4341
Next by Date: [lisp] #2: Consensus in favor of replacing IPsec with a MAC
Previous by thread: [lisp] #24: Encapsulated control packets on the LISP data port 4341
Next by thread: [lisp] #2: Consensus in favor of replacing IPsec with a MAC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.